Mortgage brokers are in the firing line of late, and now Westpac bank and the Commonwealth bank are putting pressure on accredited mortgage brokers, telling them that if they don’t have a certain number of loans settle with them within a 6 month time frame, they will lose their accreditation with the lender.
The mortgage brokers have responded by saying that their “Independence” is in jeopardy, because many brokers will bow to the pressure and set loans for clients for the home buyers or refinancing homeowner with these lenders, rather than the best loan for the customer.
In my prior article I was a little harsh on these brokers, and this brought up the question of honesty of the Mortgage brokers.
So here is my revised take on this important topic.
The Mortgage Brokers Intent indicates his or her honesty.
Honesty should not be taken on a legal or literal definition of the relationship between the mortgage broker and the lender and the home buyer or refinanced homeowner, but on the intent of the mortgage broker when they are helping their customer select the best loan for them.
If the Mortgage Broker has the intention of always selecting the very best mortgage lender and mortgage loan product for their customer, then its obvious that the mortgage broker can be considered an honest mortgage broker.
If the Mortgage broker explains to the client that they are offering a no cost loan service to them, because the lenders are paying them a commission for introducing the loan to the lender, they are being honest with the customer in my view.
If on the other-hand the mortgage is selected favours the mortgage broker and his or her own personal interest, then the mortgage broker would have to be considered dishonest in my view.
Banks and other mortgage lenders that offer lenders inducements to put loans through them, compromise the brokers’ impartiality.
So do lenders that force lenders to have sales targets. Doing so in my view makes mortgage brokers appear commission representatives of the lender.
That has to be a bad thing for the mortgage broker industry and the customer than place their trust in a Mortgage Broker to do the right thing by them according to Mr Mortgage.
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Thursday, May 21, 2009
home loan and mortgage refi rise on low interest rates
Mortgage Bankers Assoc says home loan activity on the rise with mortgage refinance leading the way on the back of low interest rates.
Lower interest rates appear to be luring more homeowners to the table to refinance.
The number of mortgage applications rose by a seasonally adjusted 2.3 percent for the week ended May 15, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.
The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, rose to 915.9 from 895.6 one week earlier.The Refinance Index increased 4.5 percent, to 4,794.4 from 4,588.6 the previous week.
The refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 73.6 percent of total applications from 71.9 percent the previous week.
The average interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 4.69 percent from 4.76 percent, with points decreasing to 1.13 from 1.18.The average interest rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 4.44 percent from 4.5 percent, with points decreasing to 1.01 from 1.08.The average interest rate for one-year adjustable rate mortgages decreased to 6.38 percent from 6.41 percent, with points decreasing to 0.1 from 0.11.
Lower interest rates appear to be luring more homeowners to the table to refinance.
The number of mortgage applications rose by a seasonally adjusted 2.3 percent for the week ended May 15, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.
The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, rose to 915.9 from 895.6 one week earlier.The Refinance Index increased 4.5 percent, to 4,794.4 from 4,588.6 the previous week.
The refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 73.6 percent of total applications from 71.9 percent the previous week.
The average interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 4.69 percent from 4.76 percent, with points decreasing to 1.13 from 1.18.The average interest rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 4.44 percent from 4.5 percent, with points decreasing to 1.01 from 1.08.The average interest rate for one-year adjustable rate mortgages decreased to 6.38 percent from 6.41 percent, with points decreasing to 0.1 from 0.11.
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Property Investors see opportunity in housing needs
Australian residential property is again being viewed as a solid investment, even though low mortgage interest rates won't last forever. This is good news for mortgage brokers who work with investors.
The home construction slow down over the last 12 months hurt mortgage brokers in the area, but that in turn has created a tight rental market and investors are back in the game.
In fact the combination of low interest rates, high rent returns and low prices can produce ,"positively geared" investments. This means two things. Property can be attractive to lower income earners without tax to offset,to be a money making proposition from day one.
This means low capital growth is not a deterrent, and this could be the case over the next few years.
At the end of the day people need somewhere to live and keep their stuff.
If they can't afford to buy, they rent and that means that there will always be people who need to rent in areas with schools, transport and near work.
The home construction slow down over the last 12 months hurt mortgage brokers in the area, but that in turn has created a tight rental market and investors are back in the game.
In fact the combination of low interest rates, high rent returns and low prices can produce ,"positively geared" investments. This means two things. Property can be attractive to lower income earners without tax to offset,to be a money making proposition from day one.
This means low capital growth is not a deterrent, and this could be the case over the next few years.
At the end of the day people need somewhere to live and keep their stuff.
If they can't afford to buy, they rent and that means that there will always be people who need to rent in areas with schools, transport and near work.
Friday, April 17, 2009
Mortgage Brokers expected to boom as home owners seek to refinance after RBA's interest rate cut
Mortgage Brokers are expected to be busy as home owners refinance from high fixed-rate mortgages after yesterday's 25-basis-point interest rate cut, coupled with high real estate sales figures in the low cost areas.
The sticking point for many will be hefty fixed rate "break fees", which can be more than $20,000 on a $500,000 home loan.
Break fees, made up of a comparatively small charge to exit the loan plus a bigger fee that is the economic cost to the bank of losing the business, had become a bigger proportion of housing loan fees in recent years, he said.
The Housing Industry Association yesterday called on banks to drop severance and other refinancing charges from fixed-rate loans, but banks are unlikely to do so.
HIA chief executive Chris Lamont said banks would be swamped with borrowers trying to refinance.
A home loan taken out early last year when mortgage rates were 7.5-8 per cent would cost a borrower about $670 a month more on a $250,000 home loan, than if the loan were taken out today, he said.
Mr Lamont believes yesterday's drop in the cash rate will have little impact on the housing market, even if passed on by the banks, as buyers already believe mortgage rates are reaching the bottom of the cycle.
"Falling interest rates are now being overshadowed by the availability of finance, with the banks asking for higher deposits, particularly from first-home buyers," he said.
Real estate agents are reporting increased home sales, particularly for lower-priced property, with Australia's biggest agent, Ray White, making $2.37billion of sales last month, a 15 per cent rise on the same month last year.
The sticking point for many will be hefty fixed rate "break fees", which can be more than $20,000 on a $500,000 home loan.
Break fees, made up of a comparatively small charge to exit the loan plus a bigger fee that is the economic cost to the bank of losing the business, had become a bigger proportion of housing loan fees in recent years, he said.
The Housing Industry Association yesterday called on banks to drop severance and other refinancing charges from fixed-rate loans, but banks are unlikely to do so.
HIA chief executive Chris Lamont said banks would be swamped with borrowers trying to refinance.
A home loan taken out early last year when mortgage rates were 7.5-8 per cent would cost a borrower about $670 a month more on a $250,000 home loan, than if the loan were taken out today, he said.
Mr Lamont believes yesterday's drop in the cash rate will have little impact on the housing market, even if passed on by the banks, as buyers already believe mortgage rates are reaching the bottom of the cycle.
"Falling interest rates are now being overshadowed by the availability of finance, with the banks asking for higher deposits, particularly from first-home buyers," he said.
Real estate agents are reporting increased home sales, particularly for lower-priced property, with Australia's biggest agent, Ray White, making $2.37billion of sales last month, a 15 per cent rise on the same month last year.
Sunday, February 08, 2009
NAB flags strong revenue growth, supports Rudd's economic stimulas package to break the cycle
National Australia Bank's new CEO delivered his debut quarterly trading update for NAB, flagging strong revenue growth, broadening bad debt issues, increasing economic uncertainty and the clear and present danger that rising funding costs would prevent NAB from passing on the full amount of any future rate cuts.
But Clyne's commentary show it would be a mistake for anyone to imagine our banks will remain immune from the economic realities, either here or internationally.
There are tough and testing times ahead and the wave of bad debts that will inevitably be generated by our almost certain recession will hit bank profits and eat into their statutory capital.
As that happens, we can expect the banks to move with defensive vigour to protect their capital bases by trimming dividends and raising new capital, though either vanilla or hybrid equity.
Each of the banks, either formally or anecdotally, is reinforcing the same business themes.
Their revenues and pre-provision earnings have been buoyed by government underwriting and the rush to quality inspired by uncertainty and volatility. Bad debts are on the rise, however, and if unemployment reaches anything like the 7 per cent widely predicted by their own economists, the need for more severe collective provisioning will intensify. There is confidence that, even if unemployment hits about 7 per cent, the mortgage books will remain largely sound. There is a general expectation that, over the coming six months there will be a worrying and costly deterioration of the business lending books.
It is clear, for example, that having almost instantly squeezed the life out of the vulnerable at the top end of the corporate food chain, the global financial crisis is beginning to migrate to the small and medium business sector.
As Clyne said yesterday, the single names that forced NAB's $521 million worth of specific provisions over the December quarter have been well known for the best part of 12 months.
"But we are starting to see more general stress and deterioration in the SME book," he said.
Small and medium businesses are the core generator of entrepreneurial wealth and employment in Australia.
The real danger of a meaningful, extended recession in that sector is that it becomes almost self-perpetuating. A small business closes, causing unemployment, which in turn forces more businesses to shut their doors. And so on. That is why NAB's collective provision increased nearly 30 per cent to $303 million over its first quarter and that is why the Rudd Government has acted so quickly in deciding to spend $42 billion of our national surplus.
The aim is to provide a circuit breaker to prevent recession.
The future is very uncertain and it is neither sensible nor realistic toThe NAB boss's briefing was a sober bookend to a week that opened with the Commonwealth Bank's Ralph Norris confirming the CBA would deliver earnings stronger than market consensus, which was then punctuated by Suncorp's rush to recapitalise in the wake of a weakening earnings outlook.
try to predict the future
But Clyne's commentary show it would be a mistake for anyone to imagine our banks will remain immune from the economic realities, either here or internationally.
There are tough and testing times ahead and the wave of bad debts that will inevitably be generated by our almost certain recession will hit bank profits and eat into their statutory capital.
As that happens, we can expect the banks to move with defensive vigour to protect their capital bases by trimming dividends and raising new capital, though either vanilla or hybrid equity.
Each of the banks, either formally or anecdotally, is reinforcing the same business themes.
Their revenues and pre-provision earnings have been buoyed by government underwriting and the rush to quality inspired by uncertainty and volatility. Bad debts are on the rise, however, and if unemployment reaches anything like the 7 per cent widely predicted by their own economists, the need for more severe collective provisioning will intensify. There is confidence that, even if unemployment hits about 7 per cent, the mortgage books will remain largely sound. There is a general expectation that, over the coming six months there will be a worrying and costly deterioration of the business lending books.
It is clear, for example, that having almost instantly squeezed the life out of the vulnerable at the top end of the corporate food chain, the global financial crisis is beginning to migrate to the small and medium business sector.
As Clyne said yesterday, the single names that forced NAB's $521 million worth of specific provisions over the December quarter have been well known for the best part of 12 months.
"But we are starting to see more general stress and deterioration in the SME book," he said.
Small and medium businesses are the core generator of entrepreneurial wealth and employment in Australia.
The real danger of a meaningful, extended recession in that sector is that it becomes almost self-perpetuating. A small business closes, causing unemployment, which in turn forces more businesses to shut their doors. And so on. That is why NAB's collective provision increased nearly 30 per cent to $303 million over its first quarter and that is why the Rudd Government has acted so quickly in deciding to spend $42 billion of our national surplus.
The aim is to provide a circuit breaker to prevent recession.
Saturday, February 07, 2009
Barclays and Llyods bank on time to rush bonuses through
Banks that are dependent on UK taxpayer support are planning to rush out hundreds of millions of pounds in bonuses to senior bankers and traders before a threatened crackdown.
As ministers in Britain prepared to curb excessive remuneration, it emerged that Barclays and Lloyds Banking Group were poised to follow Royal Bank of Scotland by paying bonuses within weeks.
Lloyds, which has taken £17 billion ($38.1 billion) in rescue money from the Government, appears ready to give hundreds of millions of pounds to top executives and more junior staff.
Barclays, which has tapped the Bank of England for billions of pounds in loans and guarantees, is believed to be planning even larger payouts.
According to the terms of its purchase of the North American division of the collapsed Lehman Brothers, Barclays is due to pay $US2.5 billion ($3.8 billion) in bonuses to traders and dealmakers on Wall Street in the next few days.
Ministers reacted angrily to reports in The Times that RBS was preparing to give bonuses to thousands of senior bankers and traders. Banks applying for government insurance to underwrite toxic debt assets and free up cash for lending are likely to have to meet conditions preventing them paying excessive remuneration, officials said.
A White Paper to be published alongside the Budget in April will beef up supervision of banks by giving non-executive directors more powers to hold bank chiefs to account. However, senior bankers suggested that the clampdown would come too late to prevent bonuses being paid for 2008.
No final approval of bonuses has been made but UK Financial Investments, the Treasury body that owns the stakes in RBS and Lloyds, is prepared to see limited payouts as long as it is convinced that they are in the long-term interest of taxpayers.
Banks argue that bonuses will help to retain and attract good staff and so hasten the end of their need for government support. Many are obliged to pay them because of the wording of employment contracts.
Richard Pym, who earns £750,000 a year as executive chairman of the state-owned Bradford & Bingley, collects a £140,000 guaranteed bonus next month. The bonus, agreed upon before B&B’s collapse, has to be paid regardless of performance. Mr Pym will also collect a further bonus of £187,500 in respect of the first half of 2009.
Lloyds said that any director bonuses would be paid in shares at the end of 2009 and that staff bonuses would be lower than in previous years.
Barclays, which reports its annual results on Monday, is expected to pay large bonuses to the tens of thousands of employees in Barclays Capital. Last year, they were paid an average of £182,000 each.
Eight former Lehman high-flyers taken on by Barclays Capital in New York have reportedly been locked into contracts paying $US10-25 million a year.
Government officials said that all banks would in future have to adopt new incentive structures.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown expected decisions to reflect the conditions of the economy and the performance of the banks. “There are no rewards for failure in what we are proposing,” he said.
Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, warned the RBS that it risked alienating ordinary people if it gave its traders and bosses “exorbitant” bonuses.
George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, said: “It would be an insult to struggling taxpayers if the Government allowed banks we part own to pay out big cash bonuses. To increase taxes on people earning £20,000 to pay the bonuses of someone earning £2 million is totally unacceptable.”
Any measures in Britain are likely to fall short of the plans by US President Barack Obama to enforce a $US500,000 cap on the pay of bank executives bailed out by US taxpayers.
In Britain, officials at No 10 Downing Street, the PM’s residence, said Mr Brown agreed with Mr Obama that a new approach to rewards was needed, although it was not thought possible to introduce an industry-wide pay ceiling without breaking contracts.
As ministers in Britain prepared to curb excessive remuneration, it emerged that Barclays and Lloyds Banking Group were poised to follow Royal Bank of Scotland by paying bonuses within weeks.
Lloyds, which has taken £17 billion ($38.1 billion) in rescue money from the Government, appears ready to give hundreds of millions of pounds to top executives and more junior staff.
Barclays, which has tapped the Bank of England for billions of pounds in loans and guarantees, is believed to be planning even larger payouts.
According to the terms of its purchase of the North American division of the collapsed Lehman Brothers, Barclays is due to pay $US2.5 billion ($3.8 billion) in bonuses to traders and dealmakers on Wall Street in the next few days.
Ministers reacted angrily to reports in The Times that RBS was preparing to give bonuses to thousands of senior bankers and traders. Banks applying for government insurance to underwrite toxic debt assets and free up cash for lending are likely to have to meet conditions preventing them paying excessive remuneration, officials said.
A White Paper to be published alongside the Budget in April will beef up supervision of banks by giving non-executive directors more powers to hold bank chiefs to account. However, senior bankers suggested that the clampdown would come too late to prevent bonuses being paid for 2008.
No final approval of bonuses has been made but UK Financial Investments, the Treasury body that owns the stakes in RBS and Lloyds, is prepared to see limited payouts as long as it is convinced that they are in the long-term interest of taxpayers.
Banks argue that bonuses will help to retain and attract good staff and so hasten the end of their need for government support. Many are obliged to pay them because of the wording of employment contracts.
Richard Pym, who earns £750,000 a year as executive chairman of the state-owned Bradford & Bingley, collects a £140,000 guaranteed bonus next month. The bonus, agreed upon before B&B’s collapse, has to be paid regardless of performance. Mr Pym will also collect a further bonus of £187,500 in respect of the first half of 2009.
Lloyds said that any director bonuses would be paid in shares at the end of 2009 and that staff bonuses would be lower than in previous years.
Barclays, which reports its annual results on Monday, is expected to pay large bonuses to the tens of thousands of employees in Barclays Capital. Last year, they were paid an average of £182,000 each.
Eight former Lehman high-flyers taken on by Barclays Capital in New York have reportedly been locked into contracts paying $US10-25 million a year.
Government officials said that all banks would in future have to adopt new incentive structures.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown expected decisions to reflect the conditions of the economy and the performance of the banks. “There are no rewards for failure in what we are proposing,” he said.
Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, warned the RBS that it risked alienating ordinary people if it gave its traders and bosses “exorbitant” bonuses.
George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, said: “It would be an insult to struggling taxpayers if the Government allowed banks we part own to pay out big cash bonuses. To increase taxes on people earning £20,000 to pay the bonuses of someone earning £2 million is totally unacceptable.”
Any measures in Britain are likely to fall short of the plans by US President Barack Obama to enforce a $US500,000 cap on the pay of bank executives bailed out by US taxpayers.
In Britain, officials at No 10 Downing Street, the PM’s residence, said Mr Brown agreed with Mr Obama that a new approach to rewards was needed, although it was not thought possible to introduce an industry-wide pay ceiling without breaking contracts.
Thursday, February 05, 2009
Queensland banking and insurance giant Suncorp CEO quits
Banking, insurance and financial services big hitter Suncorp Metway was floored when chief executive John Mulcahy resigned, after the bank announced its interim after-tax profit to be between $250 million and $270 million after being hit with significantly higher bad debt charges.
Suncorp said its bad debt expenses for the half year to December 31, 2008, would rise to $355 million - "significantly above forecasts," it said - on specific provisions and write-offs.
Suncorp said its board would declare an interim dividend of 20 cents per share, fully franked, down from 52 cents per share for the previous corresponding period.
Interim profit before tax and items, including those related to the Promina acquisition, will be between $470 and $500 million, Suncorp said in a statement.
Mr Mulcahy has agreed to stay on while the company looks for a new chief executive.
Suncorp said its bad debt expenses for the half year to December 31, 2008, would rise to $355 million - "significantly above forecasts," it said - on specific provisions and write-offs.
Suncorp said its board would declare an interim dividend of 20 cents per share, fully franked, down from 52 cents per share for the previous corresponding period.
Interim profit before tax and items, including those related to the Promina acquisition, will be between $470 and $500 million, Suncorp said in a statement.
Mr Mulcahy has agreed to stay on while the company looks for a new chief executive.
Monday, February 02, 2009
Not happy bank! Australian banks earn $2 billion in fees and charges from their customers
The major Australian banks earned $2 billion more in fees and charges from their customers while hiking interest rates independently of the Reserve Bank.
New research published yesterday showed that in the year to June, the most recent figures available, banks accrued income from fees and commissions of $22.6 billion.
The result was well up on $20.48 billion they earned in the previous year and came as they were lifting, of their own accord, rates on mortgages, credit cards and personal loans.
The spate of rate hikes started in January when each major bank moved independently of the Reserve Bank, blaming the global financial crisis for increasing wholesale funding costs.
The round of rate hikes occurred on top of the Reserve Bank of Australia's two upward movements in official rates in February and March.
The figures published by the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority did not show the impact of the 300 basis points in cuts ordered by the Reserve Bank in the past four months.
However, some of the banks have not passed on the full cuts to customers, with ANZ and Westpac keeping some of of the reduction from the 100-basis point cut by the RBA this month in their profit margins.
The level of account fees paid by Australian customers has reached a record high, with at least $1.4 billion spent in the June quarter on transaction and lending activity.
MWE Consulting analyst Mike Ebstein, an independent researcher, said the increase in fees came as customers placed more money with the major banks.
"The year end June total is up on the year end of June 2007," Mr Ebstein said.
"But the last quarter went against the annual trend and the 10.4 per cent growth in fees and commissions was well below the growth in assets and deposits."
Despite the increase in fees, Australians have turned into fiscal conservatives, choosing to hoard cash out of the volatile financial markets.
Before the recent interest rate cuts, banks were offering deposit rates above 8 per cent in a bid to reduce their reliance on volatile funding markets. However, as official rates have been cut, deposit rates have been slashed.
New research published yesterday showed that in the year to June, the most recent figures available, banks accrued income from fees and commissions of $22.6 billion.
The result was well up on $20.48 billion they earned in the previous year and came as they were lifting, of their own accord, rates on mortgages, credit cards and personal loans.
The spate of rate hikes started in January when each major bank moved independently of the Reserve Bank, blaming the global financial crisis for increasing wholesale funding costs.
The round of rate hikes occurred on top of the Reserve Bank of Australia's two upward movements in official rates in February and March.
The figures published by the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority did not show the impact of the 300 basis points in cuts ordered by the Reserve Bank in the past four months.
However, some of the banks have not passed on the full cuts to customers, with ANZ and Westpac keeping some of of the reduction from the 100-basis point cut by the RBA this month in their profit margins.
The level of account fees paid by Australian customers has reached a record high, with at least $1.4 billion spent in the June quarter on transaction and lending activity.
MWE Consulting analyst Mike Ebstein, an independent researcher, said the increase in fees came as customers placed more money with the major banks.
"The year end June total is up on the year end of June 2007," Mr Ebstein said.
"But the last quarter went against the annual trend and the 10.4 per cent growth in fees and commissions was well below the growth in assets and deposits."
Despite the increase in fees, Australians have turned into fiscal conservatives, choosing to hoard cash out of the volatile financial markets.
Before the recent interest rate cuts, banks were offering deposit rates above 8 per cent in a bid to reduce their reliance on volatile funding markets. However, as official rates have been cut, deposit rates have been slashed.
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Rising mortgage applications a sign that housing market has turned the corner
Westpac economists said in a research note that the rise housing finance in October signalled the start of a recovery for the housing market.
This momentum will hopefully support the recovery in the housing market.
The RBA's decision to slash interest rates by 400 basis points since September, and the federal government's stimulus package for first home buyers, would get new home buyers into the housing market.
The only downer is the fear of unemployment that is creeping into the scenario.
JP Morgan forecasts the RBA will lower the cash rate by 50 basis points at their next meeting in February, and by another 25 basis points in March to a 3.5 per cent rate, lowest rate since 1965.
Others are now saying that another 100 basis point reduction in February is on the cards.
This momentum will hopefully support the recovery in the housing market.
The RBA's decision to slash interest rates by 400 basis points since September, and the federal government's stimulus package for first home buyers, would get new home buyers into the housing market.
The only downer is the fear of unemployment that is creeping into the scenario.
JP Morgan forecasts the RBA will lower the cash rate by 50 basis points at their next meeting in February, and by another 25 basis points in March to a 3.5 per cent rate, lowest rate since 1965.
Others are now saying that another 100 basis point reduction in February is on the cards.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Mortgage Brokers and your mortgage are in for a hell of a ride in 2008
When it comes to mortgage rates, 2008 may be remembered as the year the market went haywire.
Near the start of the year, some long-term mortgages were around 6 percent, but by July the average rate approached 7 percent. In October, rates jumped by half a percentage point during one seven-day period, then dropped by the same amount the next week, only to surge again a week later.
"We thought the refinancing boom of the late '80s was a wild time," said Sharon Heitman, the owner of the Heitman Group, a mortgage consulting firm. "But I've truly not seen anything like this."
In years past, Heitman noted, mortgage rates followed fairly predictable trends. They would generally increase toward the end of a year, then hold steady through midwinter. By late February or early March, they would head lower and remain in a range until late fall.
But those patterns seemed to change about six years ago, she said, as lenders began aggressively packaging loans as investment securities. While that may have added financing sources, it also caused volatility.
The credit crunch and financial crisis have dried up the market for mortgage-backed securities, leaving many lenders with little or no money for borrowers.
Interest rate swings, meanwhile, grew more pronounced as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government agencies that buy mortgages from lenders, began increasing the fees they charge to help shore up their own finances.
Rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages, the most commonly held home loans, opened 2008 at 6.07 percent, with some lenders offering rates even lower, according to Freddie Mac. In the Northeast, rates were hovering slightly higher, at 6.14 percent.
By late December, the national average had dropped to roughly 5.1 percent, with some lenders offering rates just below 5 percent.
In many weeks in between, there was a huge spread.
Heitman, who receives interest-rate data daily from mortgage lenders, said that in years past the highest and lowest rates on a given day might have been separated by about a tenth of a percentage point. If a lender reported an interest rate significantly higher than the prevailing market rate, she said, she would call the company. "And it was usually an error," she added.
In recent months, however, the spread stretched to half a percentage point on some days. The higher rates reflected some lenders' concerns about whether borrowers would be able to repay their loans in a souring economy, or whether banks could resell the loans to investors anytime soon.
For borrowers, though, 2008 highlighted the importance of shopping around - a habit that mortgage industry executives say is still not practiced widely enough.
Because a mortgage broker typically sells loans on behalf of perhaps 10 lenders, at most, a borrower could be offered a range of loans that does not include the market's lowest.
Loan officers working at banks can sometimes offer other lenders' products, but they typically give borrowers fewer loan options than brokers.
This is not to say that borrowers can afford simply to skip banks in favor of brokers - last year, local banks offered some of the lowest mortgage rates on the market.
Borrowers might simply do well to exercise considerable patience while shopping around, and hope that the mortgage roller coaster slows down in 2009.
Near the start of the year, some long-term mortgages were around 6 percent, but by July the average rate approached 7 percent. In October, rates jumped by half a percentage point during one seven-day period, then dropped by the same amount the next week, only to surge again a week later.
"We thought the refinancing boom of the late '80s was a wild time," said Sharon Heitman, the owner of the Heitman Group, a mortgage consulting firm. "But I've truly not seen anything like this."
In years past, Heitman noted, mortgage rates followed fairly predictable trends. They would generally increase toward the end of a year, then hold steady through midwinter. By late February or early March, they would head lower and remain in a range until late fall.
But those patterns seemed to change about six years ago, she said, as lenders began aggressively packaging loans as investment securities. While that may have added financing sources, it also caused volatility.
The credit crunch and financial crisis have dried up the market for mortgage-backed securities, leaving many lenders with little or no money for borrowers.
Interest rate swings, meanwhile, grew more pronounced as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government agencies that buy mortgages from lenders, began increasing the fees they charge to help shore up their own finances.
Rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages, the most commonly held home loans, opened 2008 at 6.07 percent, with some lenders offering rates even lower, according to Freddie Mac. In the Northeast, rates were hovering slightly higher, at 6.14 percent.
By late December, the national average had dropped to roughly 5.1 percent, with some lenders offering rates just below 5 percent.
In many weeks in between, there was a huge spread.
Heitman, who receives interest-rate data daily from mortgage lenders, said that in years past the highest and lowest rates on a given day might have been separated by about a tenth of a percentage point. If a lender reported an interest rate significantly higher than the prevailing market rate, she said, she would call the company. "And it was usually an error," she added.
In recent months, however, the spread stretched to half a percentage point on some days. The higher rates reflected some lenders' concerns about whether borrowers would be able to repay their loans in a souring economy, or whether banks could resell the loans to investors anytime soon.
For borrowers, though, 2008 highlighted the importance of shopping around - a habit that mortgage industry executives say is still not practiced widely enough.
Because a mortgage broker typically sells loans on behalf of perhaps 10 lenders, at most, a borrower could be offered a range of loans that does not include the market's lowest.
Loan officers working at banks can sometimes offer other lenders' products, but they typically give borrowers fewer loan options than brokers.
This is not to say that borrowers can afford simply to skip banks in favor of brokers - last year, local banks offered some of the lowest mortgage rates on the market.
Borrowers might simply do well to exercise considerable patience while shopping around, and hope that the mortgage roller coaster slows down in 2009.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)